Last Update

Experiment #5

Heavy fertilisation in the water column

Nutrient-rich water + [CO2] + [HCO3] + [substrate]

Main objective

Identify the optimal parameters for cultivation of aquarium plants.

Plants

In this experiment I used the following greenhouse (i.e. emersed-grown) plants:

  1. Ammannia pedicellata 'Gold' (formerly known as Nesaea …)
  2. Hygrophila corymbosa
  3. Pogostemon deccanensis
  4. Rotala wallichii

Technicalities

Lights

Lighting interval: 8h/day

Light intensity (PAR) in individual aquariums:

top:231 µM/m2·s→ just below the water surface
middle:98 µM/m2·s
bottom:96 µM/m2·s→ at the bottom glass

Note: there was no difference between the values in the middle vs. at the corners of the aquarium on the horizontal axis (except for the top section = near the light source)

Filtration

A small surface skimmer ensured gentle water movement (circulation) and removed grease from the water surface. Apart from that, I did not use any other kind of filtration.

Temperature

The water in the individual tanks was not heated in any way and was at room temperature (22-25°C).

Substrate

While in the first set (aquaria #1 to #4) a substrate for aquatic plants covered with a layer of pure silica sand was used, in the second set (aquaria #5 to #8) no substrate was used.

1st set nutrient-rich substrate

2nd set no substrate

  • The organic substrate should contain enough N, P and micro-nutrients so these were not supplied to the water column; some of the N and P will leach into the water column.
    • I used a local gardening substrate for aquatic plants capped with a layer of silica sand.
    • In aquariums with no substrate, I used M16 stainless steel hex nuts inserted into small size (2") hydroponic net pots to anchor (secure) the plants.

Nutrient solutions

Nutrient-rich water
20 ppm NO3(half as NH4), 2 ppm PO4, 0.2 ppm Fe

Nutrient-rich substrate

Aquarium #1
pH ~7.2
~10 ppm CO2
Cations
ppm
0.0 NH4+
20.0 Ca2+
6.1 Mg2+
5.1 K+
13.5 Na+
Anions
ppm
0.0 NO3
0.0 H2PO4
24.0 SO4
35.5 Cl
43.6 HCO3
KH=2

0 Fe
organic substrate
Aquarium #2
pH ~7.5
~4 ppm CO2
Cations
ppm
0.0 NH4+
20.0 Ca2+
6.1 Mg2+
5.1 K+
13.5 Na+
Anions
ppm
0.0 NO3
0.0 H2PO4
24.0 SO4
35.5 Cl
43.6 HCO3
KH=2

0 Fe
organic substrate
Aquarium #3
pH ~5.2
~10 ppm CO2
Cations
ppm
0.0 NH4+
20.0 Ca2+
6.1 Mg2+
5.1 K+
13.5 Na+
Anions
ppm
0.0 NO3
0.0 H2PO4
24.0 SO4
60.8 Cl
0.0 HCO3
KH=0

0 Fe
organic substrate
Aquarium #4
pH ~5.5
~4 ppm CO2
Cations
ppm
0.0 NH4+
20.0 Ca2+
6.1 Mg2+
5.1 K+
13.5 Na+
Anions
ppm
0.0 NO3
0.0 H2PO4
24.0 SO4
60.8 Cl
0.0 HCO3
KH=0

0 Fe
organic substrate

No substrate

Aquarium #5
pH ~7.2
~10 ppm CO2
Cations
ppm
2.9 NH4+
20.0 Ca2+
6.1 Mg2+
5.1 K+
13.5 Na+
Anions
ppm
10.0 NO3
2.0 H2PO4
24.0 SO4
35.5 Cl
43.6 HCO3
KH=2

0.2 Fe
no substrate
Aquarium #6
pH ~7.5
~4 ppm CO2
Cations
ppm
2.9 NH4+
20.0 Ca2+
6.1 Mg2+
5.1 K+
13.5 Na+
Anions
ppm
10.0 NO3
2.0 H2PO4
24.0 SO4
35.5 Cl
43.6 HCO3
KH=2

0.2 Fe
no substrate
Aquarium #7
pH ~5.2
~10 ppm CO2
Cations
ppm
2.9 NH4+
20.0 Ca2+
6.1 Mg2+
5.1 K+
13.5 Na+
Anions
ppm
10.0 NO3
2.0 H2PO4
24.0 SO4
60.8 Cl
0.0 HCO3
KH=0

0.2 Fe
no substrate
Aquarium #8
pH ~5.5
~4 ppm CO2
Cations
ppm
2.9 NH4+
20.0 Ca2+
6.1 Mg2+
5.1 K+
13.5 Na+
Anions
ppm
10.0 NO3
2.0 H2PO4
24.0 SO4
60.8 Cl
0.0 HCO3
KH=0

0.2 Fe
no substrate

  • Water flow ensured by a surface skimmer (Jingye JY-350)
    • no filtration used
  • Water changes done once a week (with 50% of the water changed) with macro-nutrients replenishment
  • Micro-nutrients added every other day (most in the form of EDTA chelates, iron in the form of gluconate + DTPA)
  • Carbon dioxide
    • Extra CO₂ added to aquaria #1, #3, #5 and #7 using a simple glass diffuser, the function and parameters of which are described in more detail in a separate article
      • CO₂ concentration in these aquaria: ≈10 ppm
    • No extra CO₂ added to aquaria #2, #4, #6 and #8
      • CO₂ concentration in these aquaria: ≈4 ppm

Documentation

Week #1 (day #9)

  • All plants arrived in excellent condition

Week #4 (day #29)

#1
Substrate
HCO3
CO2
pH 6.4
#2
Substrate
HCO3
CO2
pH 7.1
#3
Substrate
HCO3
CO2
pH 4.9
#4
Substrate
HCO3
CO2
pH 5.2
#5
Substrate
HCO3
CO2
pH 6.0
#6
Substrate
HCO3
CO2
pH 7.0
#7
Substrate
HCO3
CO2
pH 3.0
#8
Substrate
HCO3
CO2
pH 4.0
  • Algae & Cyanobacteria
    • From around the sixth week, green water/algae (in aquarium #5) and cyanobacteria (in aquarium #6) became a serious problem.
  • Ammannia pedicellata 'Gold'
    • key events:
      • week #2-3: I was adding nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) to aquariums #3 and #4 to check if the impaired (deformed) growth of A. pedicellata 'Gold' [in aquariums #7 and #8] could be due to excess macro- (= N/P) or micro-elements
        • Following the addition of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) to the water column in aquaria #3 and #4, the condition of A. pedicellata 'Gold' deteriorated:
          • spots appeared on some leaves
          • some new leaves slightly deformed
          • some of the stems have rotted away
        • ... still, I'm not sure if it's really related to the addition of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P)
      • week #3: I removed most of the bad (= brown/old) leaves in all the aquariums
      • week #4: Following the addition of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) to the water column in aquaria #3 and #4, the condition of A. pedicellata 'Gold' deteriorated:
        • spots appeared on some leaves
        • some new leaves slightly deformed
        • some of the stems have rotted away
      • week #4: Plants in aquarium #6 had died (decayed), so I removed their remains
      • week #5: The plants [in aquariums #1, #3 and #5] were in very poor condition, so I removed them
  • Hygrophila corymbosa
    • key events:
      • week #2: There is one interesting phenomenon in aquariums #1 and #3 → the roots grow out of the pot (as if they didn't find what they needed in the sediment and turned back into the water column)
      • week #3: I removed one flowerpot (= half volume) from aquariums #5 and #7, because it was getting too big and began to over shade the other plants
      • week #4: I removed the plants from aquaria #1, #3, #5 and #7, as most of them had already grown to the surface
  • Pogostemon deccanensis
    • key events:
      • week #5: The plants [in aquariums #6, #7 and #8] were in very poor condition, so I removed them
  • Rotala sp. 'Vietnam' (Rotala wallichii)
    • key events:
      • week #4: I removed the plants from aquarium #7, as they had already grown to the surface

Week #7 (day #50)

#1
Substrate
HCO3
CO2
pH 6.3
#2
Substrate
HCO3
CO2
pH 7.2
#3
Substrate
HCO3
CO2
pH 5.1
#4
Substrate
HCO3
CO2
pH 6.1
#5
Substrate
HCO3
CO2
pH 6.2
#6
Substrate
HCO3
CO2
pH 7.0
#7
Substrate
HCO3
CO2
pH 3.1
#8
Substrate
HCO3
CO2
pH 3.8

Diary

Show detailed diary entries …

Results

Note: In the first weeks a brown haze was visible in the first experimental set (from leached humic substances from freshly flooded substrate).

Subjective assessment

The following data is a brief description of the visual condition of the plants in each aquarium (1 to 8). Green indicates best condition, blue indicates good condition and red indicates fair condition.

Ammannia pedicellata 'Gold'

  1. soil      + CO2 + HCO3 + pH 6 = 100% dead
  2. soil      − CO2 + HCO3 + pH 7 = 50% fair, but slow
  3. soil      + CO2 − HCO3 + pH 5 = initially best, after NP application bad
  4. soil      − CO2 − HCO3 + pH 6 = mostly good, but slow
  5. water-NPμ + CO2 + HCO3 + pH 6 = 100% dead
  6. water-NPμ − CO2 + HCO3 + pH 7 = 100% dead
  7. water-NPμ + CO2 − HCO3 + pH 3 = mostly good, mild deformation
  8. water-NPμ − CO2 − HCO3 + pH 4 = initially stagnant, then quite good, but very slow

Rotala wallichii

  1. soil      + CO2 + HCO3 + pH 6 = initially bad, then good
  2. soil      − CO2 + HCO3 + pH 7 = 100% bad (stagnant)
  3. soil      + CO2 − HCO3 + pH 5 = initially bad, then good
  4. soil      − CO2 − HCO3 + pH 6 = fair, but stagnant
  5. water-NPμ + CO2 + HCO3 + pH 6 = 100% bad (but rapid growth)
  6. water-NPμ − CO2 + HCO3 + pH 7 = 100% bad
  7. water-NPμ + CO2 − HCO3 + pH 3 = 100% best
  8. water-NPμ − CO2 − HCO3 + pH 4 = 100% good, slower

Hygrophila corymbosa

  1. soil      + CO2 + HCO3 + pH 6 = 100% best
  2. soil      − CO2 + HCO3 + pH 7 = 100% good, slow
  3. soil      + CO2 − HCO3 + pH 5 = fair, mild deformation
  4. soil      − CO2 − HCO3 + pH 6 = quite good, mild deformation/chlorosis, slow
  5. water-NPμ + CO2 + HCO3 + pH 6 = quite good, mild deformation
  6. water-NPμ − CO2 + HCO3 + pH 7 = 100% bad (deformation/chlorosis), slow
  7. water-NPμ + CO2 − HCO3 + pH 3 = fair, mild deformation
  8. water-NPμ − CO2 − HCO3 + pH 4 = 100% bad (deformation/chlorosis), slow

Pogostemon deccanensis

  1. soil      + CO2 + HCO3 + pH 6 = quite good, slow start
  2. soil      − CO2 + HCO3 + pH 7 = hardly any growth
  3. soil      + CO2 − HCO3 + pH 5 = 100% good
  4. soil      − CO2 − HCO3 + pH 6 = hardly any growth
  5. water-NPμ + CO2 + HCO3 + pH 6 = 100% good
  6. water-NPμ − CO2 + HCO3 + pH 7 = fair, very slow
  7. water-NPμ + CO2 − HCO3 + pH 3 = 100% bad (worse condition)
  8. water-NPμ − CO2 − HCO3 + pH 4 = 100% bad (stagnant)

Objective data

Legend: % ppm
State C N P K Ca Mg S Na Cl Fe Mn B Zn Cu Mo
Deficiency less than normal
Sufficiency 35-45 2-4 0.2-0.7 1-3 0.5-2.0 0.1-0.5 0.15-0.5 ? 0.05-0.3 75-400 20-300 10-50 20-100 2-20 0.2-10
Excess slightly more than normal
Toxicity significantly more than normal
Notes:
  • The ranges of deficiency, sufficiency (normal), and excess (toxicity) were taken from data applicable to terrestrial plants and adapted for aquatic plants using artificial intelligence (taking into account their physiological differences). However, I would like to point out that there is not any definitive standard (norm) for freshwater aquatic plants, so all I can offer is but a qualified estimate. I leave it up to the reader to evaluate and interpret this data in their own way.
  • Where I had sufficient new material available, I used only this new material for analysis. In exceptional cases (e.g., Ammannia), I also used some of the old material (i.e., original leaves/stems). However, I never used roots.

Ammannia pedicellata 'Gold'

5.7 → (14)-5-20-6 mg/ℓ (Na):K:Ca:Mg, 20-2 mg/ℓ NO3:PO4, 200:100 µg/ℓ Fe:Mn + 10 mg/ℓ CO2 + KH=2
% ppm
Tank C N P K Ca Mg Na Fe Mn Zn Cu
5.7 41.76 4.11 0.77 2.40 1.56 0.61 1.41 1014 60 126 20 Substrate HCO₃

Rotala wallichii

5.5 → (14)-5-20-6 mg/ℓ (Na):K:Ca:Mg, 20-2 mg/ℓ NO3:PO4, 200:100 µg/ℓ Fe:Mn + 10 mg/ℓ CO2 + KH=2
5.7 → (14)-5-20-6 mg/ℓ (Na):K:Ca:Mg, 20-2 mg/ℓ NO3:PO4, 200:100 µg/ℓ Fe:Mn + 10 mg/ℓ CO2 + KH=0
% ppm
Tank C N P K Ca Mg Na Fe Mn Zn Cu
5.5 41.15 4.14 0.76 1.94 1.82 0.55 2.46 3721 257 109 14 Substrate HCO₃
5.7 42.37 3.71 0.71 2.08 1.11 0.29 3.27 498 33 104 26 Substrate HCO₃

Hygrophila corymbosa

5.5 → (14)-5-20-6 mg/ℓ (Na):K:Ca:Mg, 20-2 mg/ℓ NO3:PO4, 200:100 µg/ℓ Fe:Mn + 10 mg/ℓ CO2 + KH=2
5.7 → (14)-5-20-6 mg/ℓ (Na):K:Ca:Mg, 20-2 mg/ℓ NO3:PO4, 200:100 µg/ℓ Fe:Mn + 10 mg/ℓ CO2 + KH=0
% ppm
Tank C N P K Ca Mg Na Fe Mn Zn Cu Substrate HCO₃
5.5 36.51 4.53 0.40 0.06 ? 4.58 0.74 0.46 146 76 206 13 Substrate HCO₃
5.7 40.28 4.73 0.42 0.06 ? 2.27 0.51 0.42 201 52 115 24 Substrate HCO₃
? = Questionable result (error)

Pogostemon deccanensis

<n/a>

My commentary & interpretation

See the next experiment

Back to Top