Last Update
Image by Antranias from Pixabay

Articles

Organics

Its impact on plants, bacteria and algae

Impact of Organics
on submerged aquatic plants

Okay, the user is a university student specializing in aquatic plant ecology, asking a detailed question about the impact of organic matter and DOM on submerged macrophytes. They've clearly done some reading already, mentioning a specific study about sediment organic matter thresholds and fulvic acids. This is an advanced query requiring a structured, scientific response.

Hmm, they're asking multiple layered questions: 1) types/sources of organic matter, 2) beneficial vs harmful thresholds, 3) sediment toxicity mechanisms, and 4) fulvic acid chelation. The PS confirms they need academic-grade explanations. I should acknowledge their existing knowledge while filling gaps.

First, I need to categorize organic matter clearly. The distinction between particulate (POM) and dissolved (DOM) is crucial, with DOM being more bioavailable. Sources include autochthonous (aquatic) vs allochthonous (terrestrial) - this matters because allochthonous DOM often has higher aromaticity and lower nutrient ratios.

For the toxicity paradox, the 15% sediment OM threshold they referenced is key. I recall studies where high sediment OM causes hypoxia via microbial respiration, leading to phytotoxin buildup (like H2S). But it's not the OM itself - it's the anaerobic byproducts. Should emphasize that distinction since they specifically asked if organics are intrinsically toxic.

On fulvic acids, they're spot on about chelation. Need to explain the redox protection mechanism: fulvics form soluble complexes with Fe/Mn, preventing oxidation/precipitation. This is especially vital in oxygenated waters where micronutrients become unavailable. Should mention the pH dependency too.

They might also be implicitly asking about practical applications - like how this affects restoration efforts. For instance, when managing eutrophic lakes, sediment OM management could be as important as water column P reduction for macrophyte recovery.

The response should validate their scientific thinking while adding depth: confirm that yes, moderate OM is beneficial (nutrients, buffering), but high sediment OM causes cascading harm. Tables comparing beneficial/harmful scenarios would help visualize thresholds. Must cite mechanisms, not just outcomes.

...and definitely include that fulvic acid chelation is oxygen-dependent! They specifically mentioned "oxygenated waters" - good catch on their part. Many students miss that nuance. This shows they're thinking critically about environmental variables.

Excellent question! This is a nuanced topic central to aquatic plant ecology, and your reference to specific studies shows you're digging deep. Let's break it down systematically.

I. Types and Sources of Organic Matter in Aquatic Systems

  1. Particulate Organic Matter (POM):
    • Types: Detritus (dead plant/animal fragments, fecal pellets), living particulate matter (bacteria, phytoplankton, zooplankton), organic-mineral complexes.
    • Sources: Autochthonous (internal: macrophyte senescence/decomposition, algal blooms, dead zooplankton, fish waste). Allochthonous (external: leaf litter, soil organic matter, woody debris washed in from the watershed).
  2. Dissolved Organic Matter (DOM):
    • Types: A heterogeneous mixture classified operationally by size/filtration, but chemically includes:
      • Humic Substances: High molecular weight, complex aromatic structures, refractory (resistant to decomposition). Further divided:
        • Humic Acids: Insoluble at low pH.
        • Fulvic Acids: Soluble at all pHs, lower molecular weight than humic acids. Crucial for chelation (see Part IV).
      • Non-Humic Substances: More labile (easily decomposed), lower molecular weight. Includes:
        • Carbohydrates (sugars)
        • Amino acids and peptides
        • Organic acids (e.g., citric, acetic)
        • Lipids
        • Vitamins
        • Pigments (e.g., chlorophyll degradation products)
    • Sources: Autochthonous (leachates from living/decomposing macrophytes/algae, bacterial exudates, viral lysis). Allochthonous (leachates from terrestrial plant litter/soils, wetland runoff).

II. Impact on Submerged Macrophytes: Benefits vs. Detriments

The effects are highly dependent on type, concentration, location (water column vs. sediment), and environmental context (oxygen levels, nutrient status, light).

  1. Water Column DOM:
    • Potential Benefits (Generally Low-Moderate Concentrations):
      • Micronutrient Chelation: Fulvic acids (and some other DOM components) complex essential micronutrients (Fe, Mn, Zn, Cu), preventing their oxidation/precipitation and making them more bioavailable for plant uptake (elaborated in Part IV).
      • Carbon Source: Labile DOM components (simple sugars, organic acids) can potentially be taken up directly by some macrophytes or their associated microbial symbionts (mycorrhizae, endophytes), providing an alternative carbon source, though photosynthesis is primary.
      • UV Protection: Colored DOM (CDOM), primarily humic substances, absorbs harmful UV radiation, protecting plant tissues.
    • Potential Detriments (Generally High Concentrations):
      • Light Attenuation: CDOM strongly absorbs photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), shading macrophytes and reducing growth/survival. This is often the primary negative effect of high DOM in the water column [in nature].
      • Oxygen Demand: Labile DOM fuels microbial respiration, potentially lowering dissolved oxygen (DO) levels, stressing aerobic plants and roots.
      • Nutrient Binding: While aiding micronutrient availability, DOM can also bind phosphorus (P) and potentially nitrogen (N), reducing their direct bioavailability in the water column (though sediment interactions are complex).
      • Allelopathy: Some DOM components (e.g., polyphenols, specific organic acids) released by decomposing plants or algae can have allelopathic (growth-inhibiting) effects on macrophytes.
      • Promoting Competitors: High labile DOM favors heterotrophic bacteria and phytoplankton, potentially fueling algal blooms that further shade macrophytes and alter nutrient cycles.
  2. Sediment Organic Matter (SOM):
    • Potential Benefits (Moderate Concentrations - <10-15% LOI):
      • Nutrient Reservoir: SOM is the primary long-term store of N, P, S, and micronutrients in sediments. Decomposition mineralizes these into forms plants can absorb via roots.
      • Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC): Organic matter greatly increases sediment CEC, enhancing retention of positively charged nutrients (NH₄⁺, K⁺, Ca²⁺, Mg²⁺, micronutrients) near roots.
      • Structure & Buffering: Improves sediment structure (aeration, water holding capacity) and buffers pH fluctuations.
      • Microbial Habitat: Supports beneficial microbial communities involved in nutrient cycling (e.g., N-fixation, P-solubilization).
    • Potential Detriments (High Concentrations - >10-15% LOI):
      • Sediment Oxygen Demand (SOD): High SOM fuels intense microbial respiration, rapidly depleting oxygen in sediments and porewater. This leads to anoxia.
      • Phytotoxin Production (Key Mechanism): Under anoxic conditions:
        • Sulfate-reducing bacteria produce Hydrogen Sulfide (H₂S), extremely toxic to roots, inhibiting respiration and nutrient uptake.
        • Fermentative bacteria produce short-chain organic acids (e.g., acetic, butyric), which can be directly phytotoxic at high concentrations, damaging root membranes and lowering cytosolic pH.
        • Reduction of Fe³⁺/Mn⁴⁺ can release associated phosphorus, potentially fueling phytoplankton if it diffuses up, but also changing sediment redox chemistry.
        • Methanogenesis produces methane (CH₄), less directly toxic but indicative of strong anoxia.
      • Reduced Root Penetration: Very organic-rich sediments can be physically unstable and difficult for roots to penetrate.
      • Nutrient Immobilization: High C:N or C:P ratios in SOM can lead to microbial immobilization of nutrients, temporarily making them unavailable to plants.
      • Altered Sediment Chemistry: Anoxia leads to reduction reactions, lowering sediment redox potential (Eh), which can alter the chemical form and availability of nutrients (e.g., Fe²⁺ vs Fe³⁺, NH₄⁺ vs NO₃⁻) and increase solubility of toxic metals (e.g., Al³⁺).

Addressing Your Specific Toxicity Question:

The study you mention (>15% OM in sediment causing harm) is spot on. The toxicity is primarily NOT from the organic substances themselves, but from the by-products of their decomposition under anoxic conditions (H₂S, organic acids). While some specific organic compounds can be allelopathic (e.g., phenolics), the overwhelming negative effect of high sediment OM is mediated by the anoxia and subsequent phytotoxin production driven by microbial metabolism. The organic matter fuels the microbes that create the toxic environment.

III. Is Some Organic Matter Good?

  • Yes, absolutely. [Under natural conditions] moderate levels of organic matter, especially in sediments, are essential for healthy macrophyte growth. It provides nutrients, improves soil structure and CEC, and supports beneficial microbes.
  • Beneficial Types/Contexts:
    • Sediments: Moderately decomposed, mixed mineral-organic sediments (LOI ~5-10%) are often ideal. The presence of more refractory humic substances helps structure and CEC without fueling excessive labile decomposition.
    • Water Column: Low-moderate levels of DOM, particularly containing fulvic acids, can be beneficial for micronutrient chelation and UV protection. Labile DOM (like root exudates) can stimulate beneficial rhizosphere microbes.

IV. Fulvic Acids & Micronutrient Chelation (Your PS Question)

This is a critical beneficial function, especially in oxygenated waters:

  1. The Problem: Essential micronutrients like Iron (Fe) and Manganese (Mn) exist in soluble reduced forms (Fe²⁺, Mn²⁺) under anoxic conditions. However, in oxygenated waters (like the well-mixed epilimnion or flowing systems), these ions rapidly oxidize to insoluble forms (Fe³⁺ oxides/hydroxides, Mn⁴⁺ oxides). This precipitation renders them largely unavailable for uptake by plants or phytoplankton.
  2. The Fulvic Acid Solution: Fulvic acids (FAs) are relatively small, soluble humic molecules rich in oxygen-containing functional groups (carboxyl -COOH, phenolic -OH).
  3. Chelation Mechanism:
    • FAs act as ligands, forming strong, soluble complexes with metal cations like Fe³⁺, Mn²⁺, Zn²⁺, Cu²⁺.
    • The FA molecule "wraps around" the metal ion, shielding it from water molecules and hydroxide ions (OH⁻) that promote oxidation and precipitation.
  4. Improved Availability:
    • Prevents Precipitation: By forming soluble complexes, FAs keep Fe, Mn, and other metals in the dissolved phase in oxygenated water where they would otherwise precipitate.
    • Enhances Uptake: While the exact uptake mechanism (intact complex vs. dissociation at root surface) is debated, the net effect is significantly increased bioavailability of these essential micronutrients to macrophytes and other primary producers. Plants can more efficiently acquire Fe and Mn complexed with FAs than from inorganic precipitates.
    • pH Buffering: FA-metal complexes can also buffer pH fluctuations at the root surface, further optimizing nutrient uptake conditions.
  5. Significance: This chelation is vital in circumneutral to alkaline, oxygenated natural waters where inorganic Fe/Mn availability is extremely low. It's a key ecosystem service provided by humic DOM, supporting primary production and macrophyte health.

Summary

  • Organic matter is a double-edged sword. Moderate amounts, especially in sediment, are crucial for nutrient supply, sediment structure, and microbial support. High amounts, particularly labile OM, lead to anoxia and phytotoxin production in sediments and light limitation/DOC-driven oxygen demand in the water column.
  • Sediment OM >10-15% LOI is often detrimental primarily due to anoxia-driven phytotoxins (H₂S, organic acids), not intrinsic toxicity of the OM itself.
  • DOM composition matters. Fulvic acids are key players in enhancing micronutrient (Fe, Mn) bioavailability in oxygenated waters via chelation, preventing oxidation/precipitation. CDOM provides UV protection but also causes shading.
  • Context is critical. Oxygen levels, nutrient status, light availability, and the source/quality (allochthonous vs. autochthonous, refractory vs. labile) of the OM determine its ultimate impact on submerged macrophytes.

This complex interplay is why managing organic matter loading (e.g., from watershed runoff or internal recycling) is often key to successful macrophyte restoration in eutrophic or dystrophic systems. Keep asking these great mechanistic questions – it's the heart of ecology!

Impact of Organics
on bacteria & algae

Practical challenges of cultivating submerged aquatic plants: algae overgrowth and biofilm dynamics.

Algae tend to colonize older leaves and organic surfaces first. Is this related to bacterial biofilms and organic substances?

Biofilm is the gateway for algal attachment. "Lag phase" aligns perfectly with biofilm maturation time. Organic substances are central. Bacteria absolutely require organics to establish biofilms, while algae primarily need light/nutrients but exploit bacterial EPS as a scaffold.

Plant exudates: May healthy plants unintentionally fuel their own competitors by releasing photosynthates? This is a classic ecological dilemma! Exudates are indeed a double-edged sword: essential for beneficial rhizosphere microbes but also attracting epiphytic biofilms. The key nuance is concentration and context—low levels support mutualisms, while excess (e.g., from stress) becomes problematic.

Algae choking plants can cause frustration. Solution: reducing labile organics, promoting grazers, optimizing light/nutrients.

There is also allelopathy or specific grazers as advanced control strategies.

This topic cuts to the heart of biofilm ecology and plant-microbe-algae interactions – crucial issues for aquatic plant cultivation. Let's break this down systematically:

1. Biofilm Formation: The Essential "Priming" Step

  • Your Insight is Correct: Algae (particularly diatoms and green microalgae) generally cannot attach directly to a pristine, inert surface. Bacteria colonize first and create the necessary "sticky" matrix.
  • The Process:
    1. Conditioning Film: Within seconds/minutes, dissolved organic molecules (DOM - proteins, polysaccharides, lipids) adsorb onto any submerged surface, creating a molecular layer.
    2. Pioneer Bacteria: Planktonic bacteria (e.g., Pseudomonas, Caulobacter) sense this organic layer via chemotaxis. They use flagella/pili to make initial, reversible contact.
    3. Irreversible Attachment: Bacteria secrete EPS (Extracellular Polymeric Substances) – a complex mix of polysaccharides, proteins, nucleic acids, and lipids. This forms the "glue" that binds them irreversibly and creates the biofilm structure.
    4. Biofilm Maturation: Bacteria multiply within the EPS matrix, forming microcolonies. The biofilm becomes thicker and more complex, developing nutrient gradients and diverse microbial communities (including other bacteria, archaea, fungi).
    5. Algal Colonization (Epiphyton/Periphyton): Only now can algal spores or cells effectively attach:
      • Mechanical Anchorage: EPS provides a textured, sticky surface for algal holdfasts or mucilage pads.
      • Chemical Cues: Bacterial metabolic products or specific EPS components can act as chemical signals attracting algal zoospores or encouraging settlement.
      • Nutrient Trap: The biofilm concentrates nutrients (N, P, trace metals) from the water column and decomposes trapped organic matter, creating a local nutrient-rich microenvironment ideal for algal growth.
  • Lag Phase Connection: The time needed for steps 1-4 (the adsorption of the conditioning film, bacterial colonization, and EPS production sufficient to support algal attachment and growth) is refered to as "lag phase". This can take hours to days depending on conditions (organic matter concentration, temperature, flow, inoculum).

2. Role of Organic Substances

  • Essential for Bacteria:
    • Attachment: Dissolved organics (DOM) form the initial conditioning film. Bacteria directly consume DOM (labile components like sugars, amino acids, organic acids) as their primary carbon and energy source for growth and EPS production.
    • EPS Production: Building EPS requires significant carbon and energy derived from DOM.
    • High DOM = Faster Biofilm Development: Elevated concentrations of labile DOM accelerate bacterial growth, EPS production, and thus biofilm formation. This directly shortens the "lag phase" for algal colonization.
  • For Algae:
    • Attachment: They rely on the bacterial EPS matrix. While some algae can use DOM (especially simple organic carbon) as a supplementary carbon source (mixotrophy), their primary need for attachment is the physical/chemical structure provided by the biofilm, built by bacteria using organics.
    • Growth: Once attached, algae primarily use inorganic nutrients (CO₂, NO₃⁻, NH₄⁺, PO₄³⁻) and light. However, labile DOM can fuel growth of mixotrophic algae and, crucially, fuels the bacteria within the biofilm that continuously recycle nutrients and maintain the EPS structure.

3. Plant Exudates: A Double-Edged Sword

  • Fact: Yes, healthy submerged macrophytes constantly release photosynthates (DOM) into the surrounding water and sediment. This is termed radial oxygen loss (ROL) for O₂, but also includes soluble organic carbon (sugars, organic acids, amino acids, phenolics).
  • Nature of Exudates: Primarily labile DOM – easily consumed by bacteria.
  • Impact on Bacteria/Algae:
    • Attraction/Magnets: Plant exudates are potent chemotactic signals and energy sources for bacteria. They actively recruit bacteria to the plant surface (phyllosphere) and root zone (rhizosphere).
    • Fuels Biofilm Formation: Exudates provide the carbon source for bacteria to rapidly colonize the plant surface and produce EPS. This directly facilitates the attachment and growth of epiphytic algae on the plants themselves.
    • Creates a Nutrient Hotspot: The zone immediately around the plant (especially roots) becomes enriched in labile DOM, attracting microbes and creating ideal conditions for biofilm/algae development on nearby surfaces (like those old roots you observed).
  • Beneficial vs. Harmful for the Plant:
    • Beneficial (Rhizosphere Focus): In the sediment around roots, exudates fuel beneficial microbial communities that:
      • Enhance nutrient mineralization and availability (e.g., phosphate-solubilizing bacteria, N-fixers).
      • Suppress pathogens via competition or antibiotic production.
      • Contribute to plant hormone regulation.
      • (This is a symbiotic "microbiome" relationship).
    • Harmful (Phyllosphere Focus): On the leaves and stems:
      • Exudates directly fuel the growth of epiphytic bacteria and algae.
      • The resulting biofilm/algal mat:
        • Shades the leaf surface, reducing photosynthesis.
        • Increases diffusion resistance, hindering uptake of inorganic carbon (CO₂/HCO₃⁻) and nutrients from the water.
        • Increases oxygen demand at the leaf surface, potentially creating localized anoxia at night or under thick mats.
        • Can harbor pathogens or parasites.
        • Adds weight/drag, stressing the plant physically.
      • Allelopathy? Some exudated compounds (e.g., specific phenolics) might have mild algistatic effects, but this is often overwhelmed by the nutrient-enriching effect of the bulk exudates in cultivation settings.

Synthesis & Practical Implications for Cultivation

  1. The Core Problem: Labile organic matter (especially plant exudates, but also decaying matter or external inputs) fuels the bacterial biofilm that is the necessary foundation for problematic algal attachment and overgrowth on plants and surfaces.
  2. Why Older Leaves?: Older leaves:
    • Have been exposed longer, allowing more time for biofilm establishment.
    • May have slower metabolism, potentially releasing different/exudates or having weaker defenses.
    • May have microscopic damage or senescence, providing more attachment points and leakage of cellular contents (more organics).
    • Are often lower in the canopy, receiving less light (making them more vulnerable to shading by epiphytes).
  3. Why Organic Surfaces (Old Roots)?: Wood/roots leach significant DOM (sugars, tannins) as they decay, creating intense local hotspots that accelerate biofilm and algal growth.
  4. Management Strategies Targeting Organics & Biofilms:
    • Reduce Labile Organic Load:
      • Minimize decaying plant matter (prune old leaves promptly, remove dead plants).
      • Limit external organic inputs (overfeeding, excessive soil/organic substrates).
      • Ensure good filtration (mechanical to remove particulates, biological to process DOM).
    • Increase Grazers: Introduce/algae promote populations of organisms that consume biofilms and algae (e.g., certain snails like Nerites, small shrimp like Amano, Otocinclus catfish). This is often the most effective natural control.
    • Improve Flow/Circulation: Reduces stagnant areas where DOM accumulates and biofilm builds up thickly. Makes it harder for spores/cells to settle.
    • Optimize Plant Health & Growth:
      • Ensure strong light for the plants (helps them outcompete algae for light, may strengthen tissues).
      • Maintain balanced nutrients (avoid excess N/P which algae thrive on, ensure adequate micronutrients for plant vigor).
      • Healthy, fast-growing plants may better tolerate or physically shed some epiphytes.
    • Physical Removal: Manually wipe/clean hard surfaces; gently swish heavily fouled plants (though this damages biofilms only temporarily).
    • Biological Competition: Consider introducing beneficial bacteria designed to outcompete nuisance biofilm formers (probiotics – effectiveness varies).
    • Chemical Controls (Use with extreme caution in planted systems): Algaecides often harm plants and beneficial microbes. Hydrogen peroxide spot treatment can be used very carefully on thick algal mats but damages biofilms indiscriminately.

In summary:

Your understanding is fundamentally correct. Bacteria, fueled by organic substances (especially labile DOM, including plant exudates), must build the biofilm foundation before significant algal attachment can occur. This explains the lag phase and why surfaces near organic sources (like plants or decaying wood) are colonized first. While plant exudates support beneficial root microbes, they unfortunately also act as a key attractant and fuel source for the epiphytic biofilm/algae complex that is a major nuisance in cultivation. Managing labile organic carbon is therefore critical in controlling algal overgrowth.
Organics
Review

Types of Dissolved Organic Matter (DOM) in Aquatic Systems

Dissolved organic matter (DOM) comprises many organic molecules present in both the water column and sediment of aquatic environments. Key types include:

  • Labile DOM: Fast-decaying compounds, such as carbohydrates, proteins, and other fresh organic matter derived from plankton and aquatic plants. Highly bioavailable and rapidly remineralized by microorganisms.
  • Semi-labile DOM: Intermediate stability, derived from partially degraded plant or algal materials.
  • Refractory DOM: Stable, slowly degraded organic molecules such as humic and fulvic acids, structural carbohydrates. Often derived from terrestrial sources and accumulates over time. ^1 ^2 ^3
  • Fluorescent DOM (FDOM): Components identified by their optical properties, including humic-like (terrestrial), fulvic-like (soil), and protein-like (microbial) fractions. ^2 ^3
  • Dissolved Organic Sulfur (DOS): Present in anoxic water columns, formed largely from aquatic sources. ^4

Sources of DOM

DOM in water bodies and sediments originates from:

  • Terrestrial Inputs: Leaf litter, soil organic matter, and runoff carry humic and fulvic substances into aquatic systems, especially rivers and lakes. ^5 ^6
  • Aquatic Production: Phytoplankton, algae, and macrophytes excrete or shed organic compounds directly into the water. ^7 ^5
  • Microbial Activity: Microbes decompose organic matter, transforming it into different DOM types.
  • Sediment Release: Organic matter stored in sediments, including pore water DOM, is released during mineralization and degradation processes. ^8 ^3

Effects on Growth and Health of Submerged Aquatic Macrophytes

Beneficial Effects

  • Labile DOM: Can serve as nutrient sources for microbes, which form part of the food web supporting plant growth. Fresh, easily degradable DOM supports healthy microbial communities, which in turn regulate nutrient availability and help maintain ecological balance. ^9 ^1 ^2
  • Microbial-like DOM: Associated with submerged macrophyte communities, enriches sediment and water column nutrient dynamics, promoting healthier plant–microbe interactions. ^10 ^2 ^9
  • Moderate DOM Levels: Enhance the cycling of carbon, phosphorus, and other nutrients, indirectly benefiting macrophytes through improved sediment quality and reduced internal loading of nutrients. ^11

Harmful Effects

  • High Concentrations of Refractory DOM (Humic & Fulvic Acids): Can reduce water clarity (brownification), limiting light penetration needed for photosynthesis, especially in submerged plants. Excessive DOM from terrestrial sources promotes periphyton and algal blooms, which also shade plants, inhibiting growth. ^12
  • Excess DOC: Can negatively affect growth rate, reduce vegetative reproduction, and alter macrophyte morphology due to light limitation and competition with algae. High DOC may increase microbial respiration and release of greenhouse gases. ^9 ^12

Optimal vs. Harmful Concentrations and Types

  • Beneficial: Low to moderate concentrations of labile, bioavailable DOM from aquatic sources (e.g., algae, macrophytes), promoting active nutrient cycling.
  • Harmful: High concentrations, especially refractory terrestrial DOM, limiting light and generating unfavorable conditions for submerged macrophytes. ^3 ^12

Summary Table: Key DOM Types and Their Impact

DOM TypeMain SourcesImpact on Macrophytes
Labile DOMAquatic plants, planktonSupports microbial nutrient cycling; can be beneficial at moderate levels ^1 ^9
Semi-labile DOMMixed (aquatic/terrestrial)Variable impact; moderate cycling ^1
Refractory DOMTerrestrial (leaves, soil)Harms growth by reducing light, promoting algae ^3 ^12
Microbial-like DOMMacrophytes, microbesEnhances nutrient dynamics and health ^9 ^10
Humic/fulvic acidsTerrestrial, soilReduces water clarity, limits photosynthesis ^12 ^3

Conclusion

Some dissolved organic matter—especially labile and microbial-derived DOM at modest concentrations—can be beneficial for submerged aquatic macrophytes by supporting healthy microbial communities and nutrient cycling. However, high concentrations and/or predominantly refractory, terrestrial-derived DOM tend to be harmful, primarily by reducing light availability and fostering algae that compete with submerged plants. The balance and composition of DOM are crucial in determining whether its presence in water column or sediment is helpful or harmful for aquatic plant communities.

References

Key References

  • ^1 https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/marine-science/articles/10.3389/fmars.2024.1359563/full
  • ^2 https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10121504/
  • ^3 https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/marine-science/articles/10.3389/fmars.2022.826592/full
  • ^4 https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abf6199
  • ^5 https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/marine-science/articles/10.3389/fmars.2023.1140702/full
  • ^6 https://www.cje.net.cn/EN/10.13292/j.1000-4890.202502.033
  • ^7 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780122563713500020
  • ^8 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0048969723038871
  • ^9 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37207736/
  • ^10 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0013935123009866
  • ^11 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0301479712004665
  • ^12 https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/environmental-science/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2020.527801/full

Other References → click to show

Back to Top